A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out amongst prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall at a coastal site within a north Dublin suburb, a case which includes captivated nationwide consideration adhering to an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family members residence at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of preparing breaches, environmental concerns, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Occasions post about René Collier along with the Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction operates at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a firm director respectively, look for to develop their spouse and children property. The situation has become emblematic of broader disputes together Eire’s coastline, the place enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of recognized inhabitants. Based on the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting manufactured by their potential neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally people of Dublin Road, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their scheduling permission by building a wall further than the boundaries in their web page, resulting in an encroachment on a Specific Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as such locations are subject to demanding controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments could have Long lasting ecological repercussions, significantly in a very delicate coastal ecosystem for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially crafted, is in the right position. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion being an try to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding in order to maintain their perspective, an allegation that's been repeated in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal scheduling disputes, where by sights of the sea are both equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable initiatives because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, Based on sworn proof referenced from the Irish Situations. In one account, Rene Collier waded through waistline-higher water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations, a picture that has since turn into emblematic of your depth in the dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they have been intended to Collect visual proof on the wall’s place relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Adult men entered the drinking water throughout intense climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become One of the more hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely noted that these types of steps have been cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall extended into a region impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately by the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as viewers sought to be aware of the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to further more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial instant within the lawful timeline.
With the Main of the dispute is actually a disagreement over boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain which the wall, as built, goes over and above what was accredited and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of planning paperwork, maps, and disorders attached to your authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally pressured that their motion is enthusiastic by problem for environmental defense and adherence to scheduling law. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting instead that it is about ensuring that advancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they may have described their prolonged-standing link to the area as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple merely wanting to create a loved ones residence in accordance Along with the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Particular Space of Conservation and say that each one will work have been carried out based on professional assistance and accepted ideas. Their Accountant Paul Feely legal professionals have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea for the duration of a storm, do not alter the underlying details.
The situation has also lifted broader questions about how scheduling disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of design of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description for the situation that numerous observers see as increasingly popular. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier famous the businessman experienced Beforehand been associated with neighborhood advocacy on setting up and environmental difficulties, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Times protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the website Irish Situations are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting equally the physical reality in the coastline and also the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an extreme strategy.
Because the High Court proceedings carry on, the end result stays unsure. The court must establish whether or not the wall as created complies with organizing permission and no matter if any encroachment into a Distinctive Area of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and preparing circumstances. Nonetheless the human factor continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Are living along with one another extended following the legal fees have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design works at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation lengthen further than that tackle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the importance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. Furthermore, it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental problems including environmental safety and house rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partially built, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved authorized concerns. No matter if it will finally be altered, taken off, or done as planned will rely on the courtroom’s conclusions. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will very likely carry on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to The most closely watched scheduling disputes in north Dublin lately.