A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out amongst prospective neighbours about the development of a wall at a coastal web-site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide interest pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children dwelling at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier and the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a highly publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to create their spouse and children household. The situation is now emblematic of broader disputes along Ireland’s coastline, where by growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of recognized inhabitants. Based on the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being produced by their future neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their preparing permission by creating a wall further than the boundaries of their site, bringing about an encroachment on the Particular Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, therefore spots are issue to strict controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. In their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have Long lasting ecological repercussions, particularly in the delicate coastal atmosphere including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the proper posture. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding in order to maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of the sea are the two really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, according to sworn evidence referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, an image which includes because turn out to be emblematic of your depth with the dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they were being meant to Get Visible proof on the wall’s place relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how The 2 Guys entered the drinking water for the duration of extreme weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the website turned one of the most placing descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these actions were cited to show the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into an area influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated in detail with the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant during the lawful timeline.
For the core in the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and situations connected into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is determined by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving a private see, insisting instead that it is about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, René Collier and Paul Feely Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few just looking to make a loved ones dwelling in accordance Along with the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Location of Conservation and say that each one operates are performed based on Qualified suggestions and accepted programs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering The ocean throughout a storm, don't change the underlying information.
The situation has also lifted broader questions about how setting up disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute above development of wall at coastal site has grown to be a shorthand description for your circumstance that a lot of observers see as progressively typical. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Earlier been associated with nearby advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite various Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to figure out if the wall as crafted complies with preparing permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and arranging situations. But the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Stay along with one another very long following the legal prices are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than development will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, although the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how rapidly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles such as environmental safety and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it can finally be altered, eliminated, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.